Home    Number 6, 2022

Ethnos Post-Mortem: Thoughts and Comments

[Etnos post-mortem: razmyshleniia i kommentarii]

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869541522060070

EDN: MRLFIG

Type of publication: Research Article

Submitted:  23.09.2021

Accepted: 26.09.2022

About author(s)

Sergei Alymov | http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9988-9556 | alymovs@mail.ru | Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, Russian Academy of Sciences (32a Leninsky prospect, Moscow, 119991, Russia)

Lev Perepelkin | http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4400-2011 | leonethnography@yandex.ru | Institute of Oriental Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences (Rozhdestvenka St. 12,
Moscow, 107031, Russia)

Sergei Sokolovskiy | http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0112-0739 | sokolovskiserg@gmail.com | Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, Russian Academy of Sciences (32a Leninsky prospect, Moscow, 119991, Russia)

Valery Tishkov | https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5479-9039 | valerytishkov@mail.ru | Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, Russian Academy of Sciences (32a Leninsky prospekt, Moscow, 119991, Russia)

Viktor Shnirelman | http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8469-6583 | shnirv@mail.ru | Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, Russian Academy of Sciences (32a Leninsky prospekt, Moscow, 119991, Russia)

Dmitry Verkhovtsev | http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9232-2952 | dverhovtcev@gmail.com | Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, Russian Academy of Sciences (32a Leninsky prospect, Moscow, 119991, Russia)

Keywords

theory of ethnos, ethnos, ethnicity, history of Russian anthropology, Yulian Bromley, Lev Gumilev

Abstract

This article presents critical comments and responses to the essay “Ethnos PostMortem: Soviet Theories of Ethnos in Present Day Russian-Language Discourses” [Etnos post-mortem: sovetskie teorii etnosa v sovremennom russkoiazychnom diskurse] by Dmitry Verkhovtsev, in which the author ponders over the use and misuse of the notion of ethnos in Russian academic and non-academic milieus during the last three decades, pointing to the striking fact that, despite the critique within the anthropological community, this notion has been simultaneously and steadily gaining weight and influence outside it. This discussion features contributions by Sergei Alymov, Lev Perepelkin, Sergei Sokolovskiy, Valery Tishkov, and Viktor Shnirelman.

Funding Information

This research was supported by the following institutions and grants: Russian Science Foundation, https://doi.org/10.13039/501100006769 [grant no. 22-18-00241] (recipients D. Verkhovtsev, S. Alymov, V. Shnirelman)

Citation

Alymov, S.S., L.S. Perepelkin, S.V. Sokolovskiy, V.A. Tishkov, V.A. Shnirelman, and D.V. Verkhovtsev. 2022. Etnos post-mortem: razmyshleniia i kommentarii [Ethnos Post-Mortem: Thoughts and Comments]. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie 6: 102–131. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869541522060070 EDN: MRLFIG

Full text is distributed by eLIBRARY.ru